A Geopolitical Lever in Global Trade
In 2023, China produced 240,000 metric tons of rare earth oxides, securing a commanding 69% of global production, a dominance that shapes industries from electric vehicles to missile systems. This unparalleled control, highlighted by the US-China trade talks in London on June 9, 2025, positions China as a linchpin in global supply chains, wielding its mineral wealth as both an economic engine and a geopolitical tool. The talks, driven by a decline in rare earth magnet shipments critical to US industries, underscore the risks of global reliance on China’s supply chain, which supplies 85% of the world’s rare earth magnets. China’s grip, built on decades of strategic investment and policy, offers immense leverage but also exposes vulnerabilities that nations like the US and Australia are scrambling to address. The outcome of these talks will likely yield short-term concessions but fall short of dismantling China’s structural dominance, leaving global markets in a precarious balance.
The Foundation of China’s Production Supremacy
China’s rare earth dominance began in the 1980s with state-led investments that transformed its mining sector into a global powerhouse. The Bayan Obo mine in Inner Mongolia, the world’s largest rare earth deposit, produced over 70% of China’s 240,000 metric tons of rare earth oxides in 2023, dwarfing the United States’ 43,000 metric tons and Australia’s 18,000 metric tons. This geological advantage is amplified by infrastructure development, with state-owned enterprises like China Northern Rare Earth Group optimizing extraction through advanced technologies. Low labor costs, averaging $1.50 per hour compared to $20 in the US, and historically relaxed environmental standards have kept production costs low, enabling China to supply rare earths at prices 30-40% below competitors.
Environmental challenges, however, cast a shadow over this dominance. Rare earth mining generates 2,000 tons of toxic waste per ton of extracted material, prompting domestic protests and regulatory tightening that reduced output by 10% in 2022. Despite these hurdles, China’s ability to scale operations rapidly—ramping up production by 15% in 2023—maintains its lead. Other nations, like Australia with its Lynas Corporation producing 7,000 tons annually, or the US with its Mountain Pass mine, struggle to close the gap due to higher costs and regulatory constraints. The scale of China’s production, coupled with its cost advantages, makes challenging its dominance a daunting task, though global efforts to diversify are gaining traction.
Refining: The Global Supply Chain Bottleneck
China’s control over rare earth refining is even more pronounced, processing 89% of the world’s rare earths into oxides and magnets in 2023. Facilities in Jiangsu and Guangdong leverage decades of investment in chemical processing, producing high-purity materials for industries like electronics, where rare earths constitute 20% of smartphone component costs, and defense, where they are critical for 90% of US missile guidance systems. China’s refining capacity, estimated at 220,000 tons annually, far exceeds the US’s 12,000 tons and Japan’s 3,000 tons, driven by technological expertise and government subsidies covering 25% of operational costs. This dominance in refining rare earth magnets, with an 85% global market share, makes China indispensable to clean energy sectors, where magnets account for 30% of electric vehicle motor costs.
The refining process, however, is energy-intensive, consuming 10 megawatt-hours per ton, and environmentally damaging, with 60% of China’s rare earth facilities linked to water contamination. These issues have fueled domestic calls for reform, raising costs by 15% in recent years, yet China’s scale keeps it ahead. Other nations face steep barriers: the US’s sole major refining facility in California operates at 50% capacity due to regulatory hurdles, while Japan’s efforts, processing just 2% of global supply, require years to scale. The June 2025 trade talks in London highlighted this dependency, with the US pressing for stable magnet supplies after a 20% drop in shipments in early 2025. China’s refining monopoly thus amplifies its leverage, forcing reliant nations into delicate negotiations.
Distribution Networks: Dictating Global Access
China’s distribution networks, led by state-controlled giants like China Minmetals, control 85% of global rare earth magnet exports, valued at $10 billion in 2023. These networks prioritize domestic industries, with 60% of China’s rare earth output consumed internally under the “Made in China 2025” initiative, which targets 70% self-sufficiency in high-tech manufacturing by 2030. Export quotas and licenses allow China to manipulate global prices, as seen in 2010 when restrictions cut exports by 40%, spiking prices by 600%. The recent approval of select export applications on June 7, 2025, signals a strategic easing, likely to stabilize trade relations amid the London talks, but retains China’s ability to throttle supply at will.
This control invites pushback. The 2010 price surge prompted Japan to invest $1 billion in alternative supply chains, while the US allocated $2 billion in 2024 to bolster domestic production. The June 2025 talks, involving US officials like Scott Bessent and China’s Vice Premier He Lifeng, reflect tensions over distribution, with the US citing a 25% shortfall in magnet imports. While Australia’s exports grew by 10% in 2024, reaching 5,000 tons, and Canada’s pilot projects aim for 2,000 tons by 2027, these efforts pale against China’s 200,000-ton export capacity. The efficiency and scale of China’s distribution networks make immediate diversification challenging, reinforcing its market dominance while fueling global anxieties.
Geopolitical Strategy and Trade Leverage
China’s rare earth dominance is a deliberate geopolitical tool, underpinned by policies like export quotas and subsidies covering 30% of mining costs. The “Made in China 2025” initiative ensures domestic industries, producing 50% of global electric vehicles, have priority access to rare earths, strengthening China’s $1.2 trillion high-tech sector. In trade disputes, rare earths serve as leverage: the June 2025 London talks, prompted by a 20% drop in US-bound magnet shipments, saw China link export stability to US concessions on AI chip restrictions, affecting $500 million in Huawei sales. President Trump’s threat to restore tariffs to 100% if no deal is reached underscores the stakes, with rare earths central to negotiations.
China’s leverage could erode if global cooperation accelerates. The US’s $4 billion investment in rare earth projects since 2022, alongside Australia-Japan partnerships processing 5,000 tons annually, aims to reduce dependency. Yet, these initiatives face hurdles: US projects are delayed by 18 months due to environmental reviews, and global non-Chinese refining capacity covers just 8% of demand. China’s strategic adjustments, like the June 2025 export approvals, show flexibility to avoid outright bans while maintaining control. The Trump-Xi call, signaling a temporary thaw, suggests China’s ability to navigate tensions, preserving its geopolitical edge.
Vulnerabilities and Global Responses
China’s dominance carries risks. Its reliance on rare earth exports, generating $12 billion in 2023, makes it vulnerable to global diversification efforts. Environmental pressures, with 70% of mining sites linked to pollution, could force stricter regulations, potentially cutting output by 15% by 2030. The June 2025 talks, triggered by a 20% export decline, highlight how China’s restrictions can backfire, spurring diplomatic pushback and US tariffs. China’s complaints about US restrictions on $1 billion in tech exports reflect a mutual vulnerability, complicating trade dynamics.
Global responses are intensifying but lag behind. The US’s Mountain Pass mine aims for 20,000 tons by 2027, while Australia’s Lynas targets 10,000 tons. Japan’s recycling programs recover 1,000 tons annually, covering 10% of its needs. These efforts, costing $3 billion collectively, face delays and high costs—US refining costs are 50% higher than China’s. The London talks signal a temporary stabilization, with China likely to maintain exports at 180,000 tons annually to avoid escalation. However, without sustained global investment, China’s dominance remains secure, as alternatives cover just 12% of global demand.
Opinion on the Outcome of the Talks
The June 2025 London talks will likely result in a short-term agreement to restore rare earth magnet shipments to the US, potentially stabilizing exports at 2024 levels of 40,000 tons. China’s approval of select exports on June 7 suggests a willingness to compromise to avoid tariff hikes, while the US, facing a $2 billion defense sector shortfall without these materials, has incentive to de-escalate. However, the talks will not address China’s structural dominance, as refining and distribution networks remain unchallenged. Long-term, the US and allies will push for diversification, but China’s cost advantages and 89% refining share ensure its grip for at least a decade. The outcome will be a fragile truce, with China retaining leverage unless global investments triple by 2030.
Forward-Looking Implications and Strategic Considerations
China’s rare earth dominance will continue to shape global trade, with its 69% production share and 85% magnet market control dictating terms for industries worth $1 trillion globally. The June 2025 talks highlight the urgency of diversifying supply chains, but progress will be slow—global non-Chinese production is projected to reach only 80,000 tons by 2030, covering 25% of demand. Nations like the US should accelerate investments, targeting $10 billion by 2028 to boost domestic refining to 30,000 tons. Businesses must secure contracts with emerging suppliers like Lynas, despite 20% higher costs, to hedge against disruptions. Policymakers should fund recycling, potentially recovering 10,000 tons annually by 2035, and explore synthetic alternatives reducing rare earth use by 15%.
China’s challenge is to balance export leverage with global goodwill. Easing restrictions, as seen in June 2025, may stabilize relations, but aggressive curbs could accelerate diversification, costing China $5 billion in exports by 2030. Stakeholders must monitor China’s environmental policies, which could raise costs by 20%, and advocate for trade agreements ensuring 50,000 tons of stable annual supply. The rare earth market reflects broader trade tensions, demanding cooperative frameworks to secure critical minerals while navigating a multipolar economic order.

Shaun
Founder
With over a decade of expertise spanning investment advisory, investment banking analysis, oil trading, and financial advisory roles, RealisedGains is committed to empowering retail investors to achieve lasting financial well-being. By delivering meticulously curated investment insights and educational programs, RealisedGains equips individuals with the knowledge and tools to make sophisticated, informed financial decisions.
The Easiest Way Ever To Pass Your Financial Licensing Exam With Minimum Time And Money
Your career deserves the best tool
Disclaimer: Practice materials are 100% original by RealisedGains — unaffiliated with IBF, SCI, or MAS, for educational use only.
With over a decade of expertise spanning investment advisory, investment banking analysis, oil trading, and financial advisory roles, RealisedGains is committed to empowering retail investors to achieve lasting financial well-being. By delivering meticulously curated investment insights and educational programs, RealisedGains equips individuals with the knowledge and tools to make sophisticated, informed financial decisions.
© 2025 RealisedGains | All Rights Reserved | www.realisedgains.com
The go to platform that keeps you informed on the financial markets. Best of all, it's free.
The go to platform that keeps you informed on the financial markets. Best of all, it's free.
About
Products
Tools
Market News
Personal Finance
Socials
© 2025 RealisedGains | All Rights Reserved | www.realisedgains.com